How to Scuttle a Scholarly Communication Initiative
Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, August 2013
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||32||65%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||12||24%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||1||2%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Professor > Associate Professor||7||9%|
|Student > Master||6||8%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||5||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Arts and Humanities||10||13%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||4||5%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||2||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2022.
All research outputs
of 24,880,704 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication
of 280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 202,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,880,704 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.